Chainflip AMM

Rejected venues wait the longest for re-review; a rejection has to earn another look before the scheduled date.

Chainflip AMM is a cross-chain just-in-time market maker whose liquidity providers fund virtual balances and place Uniswap-v3-like range orders or maker-only limit orders. Trades convert LP inventory between the paired assets; active management changes ranges but does not remove price divergence or adverse inventory. The 2026-08-15 endpoint reported about $9.53M across Ethereum and the Chainflip accounting perimeter. The v1 AMM-LP dossier therefore controls regardless of size.

Kill criteria: the events that revoke this verdict
• Ships a distinct product whose client return does not require range, limit-order or other market-making inventory

The research file

Mechanism and class applicability

Chainflip documents a just-in-time AMM in which LPs deposit assets into State Chain virtual balances and create range or limit orders. Range orders are explicitly similar to Uniswap v3 positions; limit orders are maker-only and return the acquired asset to the LP balance when filled. In both cases the provider supplies inventory for swaps and bears the resulting asset conversion, directly satisfying the AMM-LP dossier.

Current observation and perimeter

The DefiLlama protocol API read on 2026-08-15 classified Chainflip AMM as a DEX and reported approximately $9.53M across Ethereum and Chainflip. Chainflip’s current documentation, updated in June 2026, continues to describe active liquidity accounts, range and limit orders, deposits and withdrawals, establishing a live rather than archived product. Bitcoin may be an external swap asset, but it is not the current survey chain label.

Control, loss and exit applicability

LPs can update or close orders, but market prices and taker flow determine the inventory and mark at exit. Range concentration can become one-sided as prices cross the band, while filled limit orders intentionally exchange one asset for another. Withdrawing free collateral also depends on State Chain accounting, the Authority Set signing ceremony, external-chain vault balances and egress settlement.

Why the shared dossier decides

Native-asset settlement and active order control improve execution design but do not change the client payoff: fee income is earned by exposing inventory to market takers and relative-price movement. The v1 AMM-LP dossier therefore controls before protocol-specific scale or Chainflip review. Reopen only for a distinct product whose return does not require range, limit-order or other market-making inventory, with contracts, controls and proposed-size exit independently underwritten.

Sources

The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.

• Chainflip — active liquidity and JIT AMM orders · primary · accessed 2026-08-15
  Supports: JIT AMM, range orders, limit orders, active management, virtual balance
• Chainflip — liquidity provision and withdrawal · primary · accessed 2026-08-15
  Supports: LP account, asset deposits, range and limit positions, Authority Set, external-chain withdrawal
• Chainflip — liquidity-provider documentation · primary · accessed 2026-08-15
  Supports: liquidity providers, market making, State Chain, orders, current lifecycle
• DefiLlama — Chainflip AMM survey record · secondary · accessed 2026-08-15
  Supports: current TVL, Ethereum and Chainflip perimeter, DEX category, survey observation

Inherited controls

The verdict above grades the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The least safe layer sets the position’s grade, and the position table names which one that is.