KETJU Research

← The Register

stable-lending

Credix

Rejected
Max sleeve
Reviewed
2026-08-14 · v1
Next review
2026-11-15
Chains
Solana · crypto-backed

Rejected venues wait the longest for re-review; a rejection has to earn another look before the scheduled date.

Credix now presents itself primarily as a B2B credit provider, while an explicitly old Solana marketplace remains reachable and the protocol API still reports about $10.67M borrowed against only about $1 supplied. Stable primary repositories document the historical permissioned-market and client architecture but do not establish that those interfaces are a currently open allocation product. The observable residual exposure still looks through to off-chain borrowers, so the shared v1 off-chain-credit dossier controls; this memo does not treat legacy SDK fields as evidence of current controls.

The research file

Mechanism and borrower applicability

Credix’s current public business offers embedded B2B credit so brands can extend purchasing power without retaining the balance-sheet risk. The old Solana marketplace surface identifies accredited-investor and fintech-lender workflows, while Credix’s archived client repository records the historical software used to interact with marketplaces. Those artifacts establish a permissioned private-credit history, not a currently permissionless overcollateralized lending product.

Current observation and lifecycle

The DefiLlama protocol API read on 2026-08-15 reported approximately $10.67M borrowed on Solana but only about $1 supplied. Credix’s primary website now emphasizes digital B2B credit, the marketplace hostname is explicitly labelled app-old, and the client repository is archived. The evidence supports describing the Solana book as residual or legacy exposure; it does not support claiming that new client allocations, current withdrawal windows or current administrator configuration remain available.

Control, collateral and loss applicability

Credix’s stable source repositories show that its historical market was permissioned and used Credix or Civic passes plus program-controlled freezing and thawing of LP tokens. The archived client contains borrower, deal and pool models, but an archived SDK cannot prove present deployment authorities, collateral, first-loss coverage, servicing or recoveries. With borrower financials and real-world enforcement outside the chain, the remaining reported balance cannot be underwritten from token and adapter totals alone.

Exit applicability and why the class rule decides

Neither the current B2B site nor the explicitly old marketplace provides decision-grade evidence of a live investor onboarding path, current pool cash, contractual maturity, redemption rights or a proposed-size exit for the residual Solana balance. Historical permissioning and client code are lifecycle evidence only. The shared v1 off-chain-credit dossier controls because repayment and recovery still depend on off-chain borrower performance, administrators and legal enforcement rather than unconditional on-chain liquidation.

Sources

The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.

Inherited controls

The verdict above grades the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The least safe layer sets the position’s grade, and the position table names which one that is.

ChainVerdictGradeControl constraint
SolanaApproved · limits crypto-backed no admin key can seize funds, but stake concentration and a sub-25 Nakamoto coefficient are the standing watch items.
The memo is public. The watching is the product: the terminal reads your clients’ wallets against this Register and flags the events above when they fire. $49 per advisor per month, first 14 days free. Start the trial.