GMX V2 Perps

Rejected venues wait the longest for re-review; a rejection has to earn another look before the scheduled date.

GMX V2 GM and GLV pools are market-making capital for swaps and leveraged perpetuals, not passive deposits. LP value changes with pool assets, fees, funding and traders’ net PnL. That counterparty inventory payoff falls within the AMM class even though it is not the constant-product impermanent-loss formula; no claim of a GMX security defect is made.

Kill criteria: the events that revoke this verdict
• Ships a product line without impermanent-loss exposure that merits its own review

The research file

Mechanism

Each GM market isolates a long token and short token and backs trading against that market. GM token value includes pool asset value plus pending trader PnL: trader profits reduce the pool and trader losses increase it. GLV vaults allocate across eligible GM markets subject to utilization controls.

Control and risk controls

GMX documents PnL caps, automatic deleveraging, virtual inventory, price-impact parameters and a two-phase oracle process. These are substantive protections, and risk parameters may use external analysis such as Chaos Labs. They limit rather than eliminate exposure to oracle execution, utilization, asset prices and profitable traders.

Exit consequences

Withdrawal returns the market’s available long or short assets at prevailing oracle and price-impact terms. Pending PnL, pool imbalance, caps and any disabled deposit/withdrawal path can affect realizable value. A holder cannot demand the original asset mix or principal.

Why the class rule decides

The LP deliberately supplies inventory and takes the economic other side of leveraged order flow. Fees compensate that path-dependent risk, so the amm-lp rule is dispositive regardless of GMX’s controls or maturity. Review reopens for a product whose return is not funded by pooled trading inventory.

Sources

The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.

• GMX Docs — providing liquidity · primary · accessed 2026-08-14
  Supports: providing liquidity
• GMX Docs — liquidations, ADL and trading risks · primary · accessed 2026-08-14
  Supports: ADL reduces profitable positions when pool PnL limits are exceeded, pool-solvency controls limit but do not eliminate trader-counterparty risk
• GMX Docs — order and oracle execution · primary · accessed 2026-08-14
  Supports: order, oracle execution
• Chaos Labs — GMX risk framework · secondary · accessed 2026-08-14
  Supports: GMX risk framework

Inherited controls

The verdict above grades the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The least safe layer sets the position’s grade, and the position table names which one that is.