Moola Market
Rejected venues wait the longest for re-review; a rejection has to earn another look before the scheduled date.
Moola Market is a lending platform on Celo supporting CELO, cUSD, and cEUR, where depositors earn the interest borrowers pay. At the 2026-08-16 survey it held about $0.96M on Celo, under one percent of our $100M materiality floor. A lending market this small cannot take advised client money without the client dominating the pool: one practice advising 100 households moves $1M to $8M into a venue on the same research. The file is rejected on size, whatever the market’s quality.
- TVL sustained above $100M for 30 days
The research file
Mechanism applicability
Moola suppliers deposit Celo-network assets into lending-pool contracts and receive transferable mTokens representing principal plus block-by-block interest. Borrowers post collateral, draw open-ended overcollateralized loans and pay utilization-based rates. The lender claim is exposed to smart contracts, borrower collateral and liquidation execution, but the measured market remains below the shared version-1 materiality floor.
Current observation and perimeter
The DefiLlama protocol API read on 2026-08-16 classified Moola Market as Lending and reported approximately $0.96M supplied and $0.16M borrowed, entirely on Celo. Current Moola documentation and application materials continue to identify Celo, mTokens and CELO and Celo stablecoin markets. The existing one-chain perimeter and lending classification remain supported.
Control and exit applicability
Governance controls asset listings, LTVs, liquidation thresholds, fees, implementations and oracles, but proposals are effectuated by a 4-of-10 multisig that also has emergency authority; a separate emergency admin can pause the market. Suppliers may request withdrawal at any time, but actual redemption requires unused pool liquidity. Utilization-driven rates encourage repayment when liquidity is scarce but do not guarantee an immediate proposed-size exit.
Why the class rule decides
At roughly $0.96M supplied, a $1M advised book would already exceed the entire market and an $8M book would exceed it many times before collateral, oracle or withdrawal stress. The shared version-1 below-materiality dossier therefore decides. Reopen after supplied TVL remains above $100M for 30 consecutive days, then review each asset and borrower concentration, governance and emergency powers, oracle and liquidation performance, incidents and remediation, proposed-size withdrawals, legal access and named larger lending alternatives.
Sources
The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.
- Moola — lending and mToken overview · primary · accessed 2026-08-16
Supports: Celo, deposit, withdraw, mToken, interest, smart contract risk - Moola — supplier yield and liquidity exits · primary · accessed 2026-08-16
Supports: utilization, supply yield, withdraw anytime, available liquidity, mTokens - Moola — borrowing and collateral mechanics · primary · accessed 2026-08-16
Supports: collateral, LTV, health factor, open-ended loan, liquidation threshold - Moola — governance and emergency controls · primary · accessed 2026-08-16
Supports: 4-of-10 multisig, timelock, oracle, market parameters, emergency admin, pause - DefiLlama — Moola Market survey record · secondary · accessed 2026-08-16
Supports: current TVL, borrowed amount, Celo, Lending category, survey observation
Inherited controls
The verdict above grades the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The least safe layer sets the position’s grade, and the position table names which one that is.
| Chain | Verdict | Grade | Control constraint |
|---|