Neutral Trade
Rejected venues wait the longest for re-review; a rejection has to earn another look before the scheduled date.
Neutral Trade runs multi-strategy trading vaults on Solana, allocating deposits across quantitative strategies at the operator’s discretion. It held $12.6 million across 12 pools at the 2026-08-14 survey. The registry rejects it on size: one practice advising 100 households moves $1M to $8M into a venue on the same research, and below $100M TVL that book becomes the exit crush. Size alone decides it, whatever the protocol’s quality. At size, a discretionary trading vault would need strategy-level disclosure before the allocation could be underwritten for a client.
- TVL sustained above $100M for 30 days
The research file
Mechanism applicability
Neutral Strategy Vaults batch deposits into a Solana vault, then executors deploy capital across DeFi and centralized venues using automated signals. Managers configure strategies, fees, keepers and executors. This is discretionary multi-venue allocation, not a passive onchain yield primitive.
Current observation and perimeter
The DefiLlama API read on 2026-08-15 reported approximately $13.7M on Solana and classified Neutral Trade as an onchain capital allocator. Current documentation lists market-neutral, directional, index, private-credit and earn strategies across many venues, so the Solana deposit chain understates downstream exposure.
Control and exit applicability
A keeper batches requests and NAV updates, managers control executors and fees, and strategies may use off-exchange settlement. Withdrawals can have strategy-specific lockups, cooldowns and fees, and positions must be unwound before the batch can return assets. Exit therefore depends on manager and keeper operation as well as downstream venue liquidity.
Why the class rule decides
The shared v1 below-materiality dossier controls. Reopen after TVL sustains at least $100M for 30 days, then apply the delegated-allocation dossier to one vault. Require live positions, mandate and leverage limits, manager powers, custody terms, NAV verification, audits and incidents, fees, and stressed redemption against a direct approved alternative.
Sources
The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.
- Neutral Trade Docs — strategy-vault infrastructure · primary · accessed 2026-08-15
Supports: vault roles, strategy executors, CeFi and DeFi venues, NAV, batched withdrawals, fees - Neutral Trade — current vault catalog · primary · accessed 2026-08-15
Supports: current vaults, strategy categories, execution venues, product lifecycle - DefiLlama — Neutral Trade survey record · secondary · accessed 2026-08-15
Supports: current TVL, Solana, allocator category, survey perimeter
Inherited controls
The verdict above grades the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The least safe layer sets the position’s grade, and the position table names which one that is.
| Chain | Verdict | Grade | Control constraint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solana | Approved · limits | crypto-backed | no admin key can seize funds, but stake concentration and a sub-25 Nakamoto coefficient are the standing watch items. |