KETJU Research

← The Register

lp

Pangolin V2

Rejected
Max sleeve
Reviewed
2026-08-15 · v1
Next review
2026-11-15
Chains
Avalanche · crypto-backed, Flare · crypto-backed

Rejected venues wait the longest for re-review; a rejection has to earn another look before the scheduled date.

Pangolin is a community-run DEX, surveyed here on Avalanche. Liquidity providers hold two-token pool positions that rebalance against traders, so their balance drifts toward whichever asset falls. That impermanent loss is a loss the client was never told to expect, in a position we recommended, and the class rule rejects the entire AMM category for that reason. TVL was about $1.47 million at the 2026-08-15 survey across Avalanche, Hedera, Songbird and Flare. A product line without impermanent-loss exposure would reopen the file.

The research file

Mechanism applicability

Pangolin V2 uses Uniswap V2-style constant-product pools. An LP supplies both pool tokens, receives a fungible claim on the reserve pair and earns a share of swap fees. Arbitrage changes the reserve composition as relative prices move, so withdrawal returns the then-current mix rather than the original value split. Pangolin’s incentives and governance tokens do not remove this paired market-making exposure.

Current observation and perimeter

The DefiLlama protocol API read on 2026-08-15 classified Pangolin V2 as a DEX and reported approximately $1.47M: about $1.45M on Avalanche, $0.02M on Hedera, and small Flare and Songbird balances. Current Pangolin materials document distinct governance tokens and live contracts across those four networks. The registry corrects the prior Avalanche-only perimeter while keeping this application limited to the measured V2 pools.

Control, loss and exit applicability

Pangolin documents a 0.3% V2 swap fee, governance over protocol changes and Avalanche governance and timelock contracts. LP fees compensate activity but do not guarantee recovery of divergence loss. A V2 LP can burn its pool claim for its pro-rata reserves; thin pools, volatile pairs and incentive migration can worsen execution around that exit even though the burn itself is permissionless.

Why the class rule decides

The claim-to-source fit is direct: the surveyed balances are V2 AMM reserves and the client claim is paired pool inventory. Multi-chain deployment, DAO governance and current fee income do not convert it into single-asset yield. The shared version-1 amm-lp dossier therefore decides. Reopen only for a separately measured Pangolin product without paired or synthetic market-making exposure, followed by a fresh chain, control, incident, liquidity and alternatives review.

Sources

The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.

Inherited controls

The verdict above grades the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The least safe layer sets the position’s grade, and the position table names which one that is.

ChainVerdictGradeControl constraint
AvalancheApproved · limits crypto-backed no party can freeze or seize C-Chain funds, but one vendor writes the only production client and Messari measured over a third of stake hosted on AWS.
FlareApproved · limits crypto-backed consensus entry is permissionless, but the Foundation monopolizes governance proposals and manually executes some approved changes.
The memo is public. The watching is the product: the terminal reads your clients’ wallets against this Register and flags the events above when they fire. $49 per advisor per month, first 14 days free. Start the trial.