Ramses CL V2

Rejected venues wait the longest for re-review; a rejection has to earn another look before the scheduled date.

Ramses CL V2 is a concentrated-liquidity exchange, deployed on Hyperliquid L1 in this survey. Concentrated liquidity makes the AMM problem sharper, not softer: a provider commits both assets inside a chosen price band, and when the price leaves the band the position converts entirely into the losing asset and stops earning fees. The client sees a loss they were never told to expect in a position we recommended, so the rule rejects the category regardless of execution quality. TVL was about $4.1M across nine pools at the 2026-08-14 survey.

Kill criteria: the events that revoke this verdict
• Ships a product line without impermanent-loss exposure that merits its own review

The research file

Applicability to the surveyed record

Ramses documents an orderbook-style concentrated-liquidity AMM in which an LP assigns both pool assets to a chosen tick range. Liquidity earns only while price is inside the range, and Ramses explicitly states that tighter ranges create more impermanent loss. This is direct membership in the shared v1 AMM-LP class.

Current observation and perimeter

The DefiLlama protocol API read on 2026-08-15 classified Ramses CL V2 as Dexs and showed approximately $5.72M TVL across Hyperliquid L1, Robinhood Chain, Polygon, and Arbitrum. Current Ramses contract documentation publishes V3 concentrated-liquidity factories, pools, position managers, routers, access-control contracts, multisig, and timelock across its multichain deployment; the registry perimeter is updated from the prior Hyperliquid-only snapshot.

Control and exit applicability

The LP chooses range and fee tier, while protocol factories, position managers, gauges, access-control contracts, multisig, and timelock govern pool and incentive infrastructure. When price leaves the range, liquidity becomes inactive and the position can become entirely one token; Ramses warns tighter concentration increases impermanent loss, and a range-order exit can fail if price crosses and reverses before withdrawal.

Why the class rule decides

The shared v1 AMM-LP dossier controls because active range management changes capital efficiency but not paired-inventory divergence. Reopen only if Ramses ships a materially separate investable product without LP-token, paired-asset, concentrated-range, or impermanent-loss exposure; then review that product’s contracts, control, liquidity, incidents, exit path, and named alternatives independently.

Sources

The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.

• Ramses — concentrated-liquidity mechanics · primary · accessed 2026-08-15
  Supports: concentrated range, two-asset LP, out-of-range state, impermanent loss, range-order exit
• Ramses — current contract addresses · primary · accessed 2026-08-15
  Supports: current chains, V3 factory, position manager, multisig, timelock, access control
• Ramses — farming guide · primary · accessed 2026-08-15
  Supports: LP position, liquidity range, deposit, withdrawal, incentives
• DefiLlama — Ramses CL V2 survey record · secondary · accessed 2026-08-15
  Supports: current TVL, current chain perimeter, Dexs category, survey observation

Inherited controls

The verdict above grades the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The least safe layer sets the position’s grade, and the position table names which one that is.