T3tris Finance
Rejected venues wait the longest for re-review; a rejection has to earn another look before the scheduled date.
T3tris is permissionless vault infrastructure that charges no fees, letting anyone stand up an allocation vault. It held $11.5 million across five pools on Arbitrum and Robinhood Chain at the 2026-08-14 survey. The registry rejects it on size: one practice advising 100 households moves $1M to $8M into a venue on the same research, and below $100M TVL that book becomes the exit crush. Size alone decides it, whatever the protocol’s quality. At size, permissionless vaults would face the delegated-allocation questions: who allocates, under what mandate, and with what accountability.
- TVL sustained above $100M for 30 days
The research file
Mechanism applicability
T3tris lets a curator deploy a permissionless white-label vault, pool capital and execute an arbitrary strategy. Its official site lists CEX, RWA, OTC, cross-chain, options, staking and epoch models. This is strategy-agnostic delegated infrastructure, so exposure cannot be inferred from the wrapper alone.
Current observation and perimeter
The DefiLlama API read on 2026-08-15 reported approximately $12.0M, about $11.3M on Arbitrum and $665,000 on Robinhood Chain, and classified T3tris as an onchain capital allocator. The two-chain perimeter remains below the shared v1 $100M threshold.
Control and exit applicability
Curators choose strategy and execution and can claim fees. Settlement is asynchronous and idle capital can be routed to a money market; T3tris describes using incoming deposits to cover withdrawals before forcing an unwind. Exit depends on curator execution, settlement windows, downstream positions and sufficient cash or new deposits.
Why the class rule decides
The shared v1 below-materiality dossier controls. Reopen after TVL sustains at least $100M for 30 days, then apply the delegated-allocation dossier to a named vault. Verify curator identity and mandate, positions, limits, authority, NAV, money-market and chain dependencies, audits and incidents, fees, and stressed exit without new deposits.
Sources
The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.
- T3tris — official vault-infrastructure site · primary · accessed 2026-08-15
Supports: permissionless vaults, curator strategy, strategy-agnostic scope, asynchronous settlement, idle-capital yield, withdrawal funding - Robinhood — current chain documentation · primary · accessed 2026-08-15
Supports: Robinhood Chain identity, Arbitrum-based L2, permissionless deployment, settlement dependency - DefiLlama — T3tris Finance survey record · secondary · accessed 2026-08-15
Supports: current TVL, Arbitrum, Robinhood Chain, allocator category, survey perimeter
Inherited controls
The verdict above grades the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The least safe layer sets the position’s grade, and the position table names which one that is.
| Chain | Verdict | Grade | Control constraint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arbitrum One | Approved · limits | hybrid | a single sequencer orders >99% of transactions and admin keys can upgrade bridge contracts on a ~7-day timelock. |
| Robinhood Chain | Rejected | hybrid | one sequencer and two permissioned validators sit beneath an emergency council and transaction filter that can defeat the normal force-inclusion backstop. |