Turbos
Rejected venues wait the longest for re-review; a rejection has to earn another look before the scheduled date.
Turbos is a decentralized exchange on Sui. Providing liquidity to its pools means holding a two-asset position that the market rebalances toward whichever asset falls, which is impermanent loss by another route. The class rule rejects the entire AMM category because that loss cannot be explained to a mass-affluent client in two sentences and cannot be defended when it appears in a position we recommended. Protocol quality does not change the mechanism. At the 2026-08-16 survey Turbos held about $3.23M on Sui.
- Ships a product line without impermanent-loss exposure that merits its own review
The research file
Mechanism applicability
Turbos is a non-custodial concentrated-liquidity AMM on Sui. LPs supply a token pair inside a selected price interval and earn pool fees while trades and arbitrage alter the assets held by the position. A range can also behave like a gradual limit order and become one-sided. Capital efficiency and flexible range management therefore change the intensity and timing, not the existence, of paired market-making exposure.
Current observation and perimeter
The DefiLlama protocol API read on 2026-08-16 classified Turbos as a DEX and reported approximately $3.23M entirely on Sui, up materially from the stale $0.8M observation. Turbos’ current site still markets concentrated-liquidity trading and LP fee earning on Sui alongside separate launchpad and Turbos.fun products. This application remains limited to the surveyed DEX liquidity rather than those other product lines.
Control, loss and exit applicability
LPs select pairs, fee tiers and price ranges; Turbos documents higher fees for less-correlated pairs precisely because providers assume greater price risk. Its CLMM does not rely on an external oracle to execute pool pricing, although separate displayed pricing may use external feeds. A provider removes liquidity for the position’s current two-token inventory and pays network costs but no protocol withdrawal fee, realizing any one-sided range outcome.
Why the class rule decides
Turbos’ own mechanism materials establish paired concentrated liquidity, explicit relative-price risk and range-selected inventory. The increase to about $3.23M, non-custodial design and fee tiers do not convert that claim into single-asset yield. The shared version-1 amm-lp dossier therefore decides. Reopen only for a separately measured Turbos product without paired or synthetic market-making exposure, followed by a fresh control, incident, liquidity and alternatives review.
Sources
The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.
- Turbos — current Sui DEX and liquidity products · primary · accessed 2026-08-16
Supports: Sui, DEX, concentrated liquidity, LP fees, current lifecycle, separate products - Turbos — concentrated-liquidity mechanism · primary · accessed 2026-08-16
Supports: AMM, token pair, price range, LP fees, one-sided position - Turbos — fee tiers and relative-price risk · primary · accessed 2026-08-16
Supports: fee tiers, token correlation, price risk, deposit fee, withdrawal fee - Turbos — CLMM oracle and pricing design · primary · accessed 2026-08-16
Supports: CLMM, no external oracle, pricing, Pyth, SupraOracles - DefiLlama — Turbos survey record · secondary · accessed 2026-08-16
Supports: current TVL, Sui, DEX category, survey observation
Inherited controls
The verdict above grades the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The least safe layer sets the position’s grade, and the position table names which one that is.
| Chain | Verdict | Grade | Control constraint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sui | Rejected | freezable | freeze and seizure are demonstrated: standing validator deny lists began freezing the Cetus exploiter’s ~$162M within about 80 minutes, and a Foundation-organized vote later moved the frozen funds without the owner’s keys. |