KETJU Research

← The Register

stable-lending

Wildcat Protocol

Rejected
Max sleeve
Reviewed
2026-08-15 · v1
Next review
2026-11-15
Chains
Ethereum · sovereign, Plasma · freezable

Rejected venues wait the longest for re-review; a rejection has to earn another look before the scheduled date.

Wildcat lets approved borrowers deploy undercollateralised credit markets whose lenders take direct exposure to the named borrower. Borrowers choose reserve, term, rate, access, and withdrawal-cycle parameters and can draw assets down to the reserve requirement; repayment ultimately depends on the borrower returning assets. Wildcat warns that default can cause substantial or total lender loss. The shared off-chain-credit rule therefore decides before size or protocol quality: an advisor cannot independently verify borrower assets, liabilities, seniority, recovery and stressed liquidity from the market token. The 2026-08-15 survey reported $9.83M supplied and $171.5M borrowed across Ethereum and Plasma.

The research file

Mechanism and class applicability

Wildcat markets are direct credit facilities to protocol-approved borrowers. A borrower may set a reserve ratio from zero to 100%, draw available assets, choose open or fixed term, set a withdrawal cycle up to 90 days and gate lender access. Optional onchain collateral contracts exist, but Wildcat states the default design is under- or uncollateralized. This is direct borrower-credit exposure governed by the shared v1 off-chain-credit dossier.

Current observation and perimeter

The DefiLlama API read on 2026-08-15 reported approximately $9.83M supplied across Ethereum and Plasma and separately reported about $171.5M borrowed. The chain perimeter is corrected from Ethereum-only. Neither the small liquid reserve nor the large borrowed balance supplies borrower-level assets, liabilities, seniority or recovery evidence.

Control, loss and exit applicability

Borrowers control market rates, reserve ratios, terms, access hooks and withdrawal-cycle settings within protocol bounds. Withdrawal requests receive available reserves pro rata and depend on borrower repayment; protocol fees rank ahead of lenders. Wildcat’s risk disclosure says borrower default or refusal to repay may cause substantial or total loss, and known-issues documentation describes malicious or delinquent borrower behavior that code cannot fully prevent.

Why the class rule decides

The shared v1 off-chain-credit dossier controls because repayment and recovery depend on a borrower whose complete financial condition and creditor waterfall are not continuously verifiable onchain. Reopen only for a named market after independently audited borrower assets and liabilities, legal entity and claim, collateral and liens, seniority, cash flows, defaults and realized recoveries are current, and proposed-size withdrawal can be executed without borrower discretion or new lender funding.

Sources

The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.

Inherited controls

The verdict above grades the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The least safe layer sets the position’s grade, and the position table names which one that is.

ChainVerdictGradeControl constraint
EthereumApproved sovereign No sequencer, no upgrade key, no operator who can be compelled — rule changes require social consensus.
PlasmaRejected freezable the production validator committee is permissioned and the public docs still describe decentralization as a phased future rollout with no fixed access timeline.
The memo is public. The watching is the product: the terminal reads your clients’ wallets against this Register and flags the events above when they fire. $49 per advisor per month, first 14 days free. Start the trial.