zkSwap V2

Rejected venues wait the longest for re-review; a rejection has to earn another look before the scheduled date.

zkSwap V2 is a classic two-asset AMM deployed across ZKsync Era, Sonic and Monad. Providers deposit a pair, receive LP tokens and withdraw the two pool assets; the Zap may hide the balancing trade but does not remove inventory rebalancing or impermanent loss. The 2026-08-16 survey measured about $517,000, almost entirely on ZKsync Era. The standing AMM-LP dossier is dispositive regardless of size: incentives and convenience cannot make the two-asset inventory exposure suitable for the advised-client mandate.

Kill criteria: the events that revoke this verdict
• Ships a product line without impermanent-loss exposure that merits its own review

The research file

Mechanism applicability

The official V2 liquidity flow requires both assets in a pair, mints a V2 LP token and returns the two underlying assets when liquidity is removed. zkSwap’s Zap can start from an imbalanced deposit or exit into one token only by executing internal swaps. It changes transaction packaging, not the LP’s exposure to relative-price-driven pool rebalancing.

Control applicability

zkSwap lists ownerless V2 routers and factories on ZKsync Era, Sonic and Monad. On ZKsync Era it separately identifies a fee setter behind a 48-hour core timelock, while the project’s core and funds wallets are 3-of-5 multisigs. Those controls matter to a protocol review but cannot remove the AMM inventory mechanism that drives the class result.

Exit and perimeter applicability

The ordinary exit burns LP tokens and returns both pool assets in the current reserve ratio. Zap-out can swap that output into one token, adding routing, price-impact and execution dependencies. The 2026-08-16 survey recorded about $516,000 on ZKsync Era plus small live balances on Sonic and Monad, establishing the current three-chain perimeter.

Why the dossier still applies

Every reviewed V2 path remains a two-asset AMM position, so the amm-lp basis is fundamental and the shared dossier remains the decision. Reopen only for a separately reviewable product without LP inventory rebalancing; higher TVL, more chains, rewards or a one-click Zap would not by themselves change the classification.

Sources

The claims above trace to these. Where a number could not be independently verified, the thesis says so.

• zkSwap Finance Docs — add and remove V2 liquidity · primary · accessed 2026-08-16
  Supports: paired-asset V2 deposit, LP token receipt, two-asset withdrawal
• zkSwap Finance Docs — Zap · primary · accessed 2026-08-16
  Supports: V2 50/50 balancing, internal swap on imbalanced entry, single-token zap-out execution
• zkSwap Finance Docs — ZKsync Era V2 contracts · primary · accessed 2026-08-16
  Supports: ownerless V2 router and factory, 48-hour timelocked fee setter
• zkSwap Finance Docs — Sonic V2 contracts · primary · accessed 2026-08-16
  Supports: Sonic V2 deployment, ownerless Sonic V2 router and factory
• DefiLlama — zkSwap V2 survey record · secondary · accessed 2026-08-16
  Supports: approximately $517,000 current TVL, ZKsync Era Sonic and Monad balances, DEX category

Inherited controls

The verdict above grades the protocol layer. Every position also inherits the asset it holds and the chain it settles on. The least safe layer sets the position’s grade, and the position table names which one that is.